Saturday, 30 June 2018

The Third Annual Olivia de Havilland Blogathon is Here!!!


It's here!! The Third Annual Olivia de Havilland Blogathon is here!!! It's smaller than the previous two celebrations but that doesn't make it any less special. Crystal and I are excited to be hosting this event again and can't wait to read all the entries celebrating the amazing and beautiful Dame Olivia!!!

THE POSTS

"I do hope people don't think I'm really like this..."

The Wonderful World of Cinema kicks things off with The Snake Pit (1948).

"I wonder if there will be a remake of this...?"

The Stop Button gives us an analysis of what does and doesn't work in My Cousin Rachel (1952).

"Don't be so angry, Bette. There's an annual blogathon for you too!"

Musings of a Classic Film Addict discovers In This Our Life (1942).

"So wait.. which one of us is real?"

I cover Olivia's duel role in The Dark Mirror (1946).

"I don't always make TV movies, but when I do I still look fabulous."

Realweegiemidget Reviews takes a look at one of Olivia's TV Movies, Murder is Easy (1982).

"I'm no angel?"

The Dream Book Blog finds Olivia to be no angel as famous author Charlotte Bronte in Devotion (1946).

"Next years' blogathon seems so far away!"

Caftan Woman sees Olivia de Havilland come full circle from her early Westerns in The Proud Rebel (1958).

"Just because you don't get the guy doesn't mean you can't look fabulous!"

Pure Entertainment Preservation Society looks at The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex (1939) from a historical and code perspective.

"I just love blogathons, don't you?"

Taking Up Room discovers a different side of  Olivia in It's Love I'm After (1937).

"Hello? 2018?"

Critica Retro finds Hold Back the Dawn (1941) to be a timely film.

"I'm not always window dressing!"

Movies Meet Their Match finds a deeper meaning in Santa Fe Trail (1940).


Old Hollywood Films wraps things up with The Charge of the Light Brigade (1936).

A huge thank you to all who helped celebrate and to Crystal for once again co-hosting this event with me!!! I hope to see you all again next year!!

DAILY CALL SHEET: JUNE 30, 2018

Cruel Jaws

Cruel Jaws (1995) Calling it Jaws 5 doesn't allow you to splice in scenes from much better shark movies. Or use the Star Wars theme for that matter! C'mon, Bruno, you're better than this. Well, sometimes. TIL: Imitation may be flattery, but flattery's a sin. So is this movie.

City That Never Sleeps

Your daily dose of culture courtesy of City That Never Sleeps (1953) - "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein

Movies I Watched in June


We canceled our Netflix this month so I spent a lot of time finishing up some tv shows and documentaries. I also finished a film series this month, the Andy Hardy series! And watched a movie from this year!! *gasp!* I rarely watch a film the same year it's released lol.
  1. Harold Lloyd shorts (1917-1919) - Harold Lloyd & Bebe Daniels, Snub Pollard
  2. A Woman's Face (1938 - Swedish) - Ingrid Bergman
  3. Father Takes a Wife (1941) - Adolph Menjou & Gloria Swanson 
  4. Moon Over Miami (1941) - Betty Grable & Don Ameche, Robert Cummings & Carole Landis
  5. Bathing Beauty (1944) - Esther Williams & Red Skelton 
  6. Uncertain Glory (1944) - Errol Flynn, Faye Emerson 
  7. Three Strangers (1946) - Geraldine FitzGerald, Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre
  8. Fiesta (1947) - Esther Williams, Ricardo Montalbon, Mary Astor
  9. The Clay Pigeon (1949) - Bill Williams & Barbara Hale
  10. Callaway Went Thataway (1951) - Howard Keel, Fred MacMurrey, Dorothy McGuire 
  11. Anastasia (1956) - Ingrid Bergman & Yul Brenner, Helen Hayes
  12. Andy Hardy Comes Home (1958) - Mickey Rooney, Faye Holden, Sara Haden, Cecilia Parker
  13. A Global Affair (1964) - Bob Hope
  14. The Double Man (1967) - Yul Brenner
  15. The Devil’s Brigade (1968) - William Holden, Cliff Robertson 
  16. Tomb Raider (2018) - Alicia Vikander 
This is Bob Hope (2017)
Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story (2017)

 
Bill Williams and Barbara Hale in The Clay Pigeon. They were married in real life.

Friday, 29 June 2018

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953)

I really enjoyed Marilyn Monroe in Billy Wilder's Some Like It Hot so I decided to check out some more of her work. My first choice fell on Gentlemen Prefer Blondes as I had heard of it many times before and was curious to see what it was about (yes, I still don't read plots before watching movies. I like it better that way). 

The film follows two showgirls and best friends, Lorelei Lee (Marilyn Monroe) and Dorothy Shaw (Jane Russell). Lorelai is engaged to a wealthy nerd, Gus Esmond (Tommy Noonan), whose father (Taylor Holmes) disapproves of their relationship and is convinced that Lorelei is only after his son's money. So when Lorelei and Dorothy go on a cruise together, Esmond Sr. hires a private detective, Ernie Malone (Elliott Reid), to keep an eye on her. 

The plot is basically non-existent, it's pretty silly and doesn't make a lot of sense --and it's not only because of the plot holes but because it is just a weak mess. And you can tell how it's going to end right from the start. And it isn't even the most interesting of the stories. 

However, that didn't bother me at all and didn't prevent me from enjoying Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. The cast is what does the trick here. I think we can all agree that Marilyn Monroe isn't the greatest of actresses, but she manages to find a way to shine. She fits the role of the very shallow and dumb blonde who has a passion for diamonds and men with money very well, delivers well her lines and is great at making fun of herself. Jane Russell though completely steals the show. She has more sex appeal than Monroe if you ask me, and her performance as Dorothy, an intelligent and strong-willed woman, is more natural than Monroe's. The male actors, although they all portray pretty stupid and single-minded men, do a good job as well. As for the chemistry, it's incredible between Monroe and Russell but there's a huge lack of it between them and their male costars. 

20th Century Fox
It also helps that Gentlemen Prefer Blondes isn't just a romantic comedy, but a musical. I know I said I'm not a musical person many times before, and I'm still not a musical person, but the numbers are so dazzling, colourful and engaging, they actually improve the film. 

Something I really disliked about the movie? How it portrays women as shallow and golddiggers --but I guess it's normal considering how old the movie is. 

DAILY CALL SHEET: JUNE 29, 2018

Cannibal Apocalypse

Cannibal Apocalypse (1980) The indispensable John Saxon stars in this odd crime/horror hybrid in which former POWs develop a taste for human flesh. Worst PTSD analogy ever? TIL: St. John Chrysostom considered slander a type of cannibalism in which one devours another's good name.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2)

Your daily dose of culture courtesy of A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) - “A ruffled mind makes a restless pillow.” – Charlotte Bronte

WRITTEN REVIEW: You're So Cool, Brewster: The Story of Fright Night

By CORY CARR
The vampire creature feature Fright Night from filmmaker Tom Holland, and it's equally monstrous sequel have been fan favorites for over thirty thirsty years. Fans have watched and re-watched these films. Fans have gotten Fright Night tattoos and have cosplayed as Fright Night characters, and they have spend an incalculable amount of dough on t-shirts and movie merch. And what's funny about this rabid fandom for Fright Night, is that this same rabid fandom that it's creator, Holland, shares with them for the horror genre in general.
CONTINUE READING

HORROR PACK UNBOXING - June 2018


Welcome back for yet another Horror Pack Unboxing! This month comes with some pleasant surprises - some that we can all be happy for. First off is The Editor from those crazy cats over at Astron-6, then there is the stoner fairy-tale Hansel & Gretel Get Baked, followed by this months blu-ray exclusive, Pieces - hailing from the golden age of the slasher genre from Grindhouse Releasing. Are there only three? No, the fourth is Devil, a film that isn't bad, but has proven to be divisive among horror/film mans. Some love it and some hate it and for that Devil is this month's weakling. But hey, ya cant win 'em all and this is a pretty rad group of flick for the month of June!
CONTINUE READING

Murder on the Orient Express (2017)

I love a good mystery novel/film and over the past year, I read a lot of Agatha Christie's novels. Murder on the Orient Express, with its mindblowing ending, was one of my favourites which is why I was very excited about Kenneth Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express mainly because of its stellar cast. I eventually skipped it because of the not-so-pleasing reviews. I finally decided to give it a chance and it isn't that bad. It isn't that good either though.

The storyline, everybody knows it. The famous detective Hercules Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) is vacationing in Istanbul and soon finds himself on the Orient Express on a trip to Calais, sharing the train with an eclectic assortment of travellers. Of course, a murder is committed and, as the train gets stopped by an avalanche and the passengers find themselves trapped in the train, Poirot must solve the crime before the train starts working again.

With the plot comes the first problem. It is convoluted, messy and sluggish. Some key plot points are left out and we are never given any clue to find out on our own who the murderer is, as the novel did (I haven't seen Sidney Lumet's 1974 film so I can't make the comparison). To that, add the fact that Kenneth Branagh's director completely failed to build and deliver tension and suspense. In spite of that and the fact that I already knew who the murderer was, the film was surprisingly gripping and it managed to hold my attention for most of its running time. 

The characters are also quite a mess. Their introduction is such a mess, I doubt anyone who hasn't either read the novel or seen one of the many adaptations could understand who they were. It confused me, for heaven's sake! Also, the characterization and development are basically non-existent. 

20th Century Fox
Murder on the Orient Express also has many action sequences that are dull and tedious, they look absolutely ridiculous and really had nothing to the story or film. Also, Poirot engaging in action sequences? I don't think I've ever seen something so out-of-character. What's even more annoying is that they add absolutely anything, not even a little excitement.

The acting, on the other hand, is decent, if not good. While he did a mediocre to say the least job directing the film, Kenneth Branagh actually did a good job portraying the famous detective. I was a bit worried, to be honest, because I'm used to David Suchet's great Poirot so much, but Branagh really did well. He captures the character's gestures and expressions very well. And the accent is pretty good too (I have a French cousin, I know what I'm talking about). Johnny Depp does a decent job as Ratchett. There's still a little resemblance, but this time around he's not playing the drunk pirate. And Michelle Pfeiffer gives a very captivating performance.

The cinematography is also quite beautiful --not Oscar beautiful though -- and so are costumes and designs. And the makeup isn't bad.

Thursday, 28 June 2018

DAILY CALL SHEET: JUNE 28, 2018

Rebel High

Rebel High (1987) Blame Canada! After all, they're the ones who made this alleged comedy. Imagine Rock 'n' Roll High School with no heart, soul, or reason to exist. TIL: The CCC states that moral virtues grow through education. Of course, that depends on what you're taught.

Hysterical

Your daily dose of culture courtesy of Hysterical (1983) - "It is far better to be alone, than to be in bad company." - George Washington

Now Showing Marquee 6

And finally, over at The New Liturgical Movement, they’ve run across an old 1962 motivational short film made by the Franciscans to promote vocations. Oh, did I mention it stars.. Jack Nicholson? Go check it out.

Talk to Her (2002)

I've been meaning to watch Pedro Almodóvar's Talk to Her (Spanish: Hable con ella) for the longest time as I read a lot of great things about it. Unfortunately, it didn't meet my expectations. 

Benigno (Javier Cámara) is a nurse who has dedicated his past four years of life to his only patient, Alicia (Leonor Watling), a young and beautiful dancer in a coma as a result of an accident. Marco (Darío Grandinetti) is a journalist who is in love with Lydia (Rosario Flores), a female bullfighter who is also in a coma after being gored by a bull. The two men meet in the hospital and a friendship begins to develop.

The plot manages to be interesting and disappointing altogether. With a part of it set in the present and a part set in the past, Almodóvar skillfully plays with time and makes the story more interesting by using texts to indicate the period. What's fascinating about it is that he doesn't always indicate when we are seeing a flashback which makes the story more confusing and intriguing. Not to mention the surprising twists. And yet, it never fully engaged me and I found that the plot relies too much on contrived coincidences, especially on Benigno's story --I mean, the girl Benigno has a crush on has an accident, goes in a coma and is submitted to the hospital in which Benigno works? Come on, Pedro, you can do better than that.

That, however, it's that big of a deal since Talk to Her is all about its characters. They are very unusual as Almodóvar's protagonists are usually strong and striking female characters and this time around the protagonists are two men. Unfortunately, although Almodóvar put a lot of effort and time into developing the characters and getting us to know them, I never felt sympathy for any of them, which is something you are supposed to feel because of the way the characters are delivered to us.

Warner Sogefilms, Sony Pictures Classics
On the other hand, they are quite interesting as Almodóvar plays a little with gender roles. Lydia is a bullfighter which is associated with men as it is a traditionally masculine activity. Benigno is a nurse which is usually associated with women. Same goes with Marco who is very sensitive. At the same time, these characters have still those characteristics associated with their gender.

The cast does a good job, the standout easily being Javier Cámara. He is superb as Benigno as he portrays the character's sensitivity and neediness very well, not to mention how he manages to deliver some incredible things with a very straight face.

And yet, in spite of all that, Talk to Her didn't really work for me and only in part, it has something to do with the awful way animals were treated while making this film. Bulls were killed for real in this film.

Thursday Movie Picks: Television Edition: Spin-Offs


I skipped May's Television week of Wandering Through the Shelves' Thursday Movie Picks because I had nada to pick from (I don't even remember what the theme was) but I just couldn't miss spin-offs week. Without further ado, here are my picks

Better Call Saul (2015- )

Before becoming Breaking Bad's Saul Goodman, he was Jimmy McGill, a struggling lawyer in Albuquerque, New Mexico. This show shows us how he became Walter White's morally challenged lawyer. This show is so good, and the mix of comedy and drama is just right. Not to mention how good Bob Odenkirk is. 

The Cleveland Show (2009-2013)

A spin-off of Family Guy, it follows Peter Griffin's neighbour Cleveland Brown as he moves with his son to Stoolbend, VA, to start a new life with his old high school sweetheart, Donna, and her two children. It's not nearly as good as Family Guy but I enjoyed the episodes I've seen.

Young Sheldon (2017- )

Sheldon Cooper has always been my favourite character from The Big Bang Theory, mostly because he's the one I can relate the most, and this series follows the early life of Sheldon, a child genius growing up in Texas. If you don't like Sheldon, just watch this and you'll fall in love with him. Iain Armitage is so lovable, Zoe Perry just nails the role of Sheldon's mother and Annie Potts is brilliant as Meemaw. 

Wednesday, 27 June 2018

Seabiscuit Movie Review

Seabiscuit (2003)
Watch Seabiscuit on Amazon Video
Written by: Laura Hillenbrand (book), Gary Ross (screenplay)
Directed by: Gary Ross
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Jeff Bridges, Elizabeth Banks, Chris Cooper, William H. Macy
Rated: PG-13
Watch the trailer

Plot
The true story of the undersized Depression-era racehorse whose victories lifted not only the spirits of the team behind it but also those of the nation.

Verdict
It's an almost prototypical feel good, heartwarming underdog story. Despite insurmountable obstacles the underdog triumphs, and this really pulls out all the stops on the obstacles. The movie also does a great job of contextualizing the story.
Watch it.

Review
Opening with a brief history and the social context of the time, this ties three underdog stories together during the Great Depression.
Tobey Maguire plays Red Pollard.
Charles Howard is a bicycle repair man that ends up becoming the largest steam automobile dealer in the states. We know that industry won't last forever, but a personal tragedy is what ultimately leads him to horse racing. Red Pollard is a well-off kid when the depression hits, forcing him to leave his family and survive by being an amateur boxer and horse jockey. Tom Smith is a horse trainer that's a bit out there.

With that premise, these three men cross paths with a wild colt, Seabiscuit. Tom's an animal lover at heart and Howard trusts his judgement since Howard doesn't know the first thing about horses. Red is willing to ride for anyone that will give him a chance.
There's a nice subtlety to the movie. It knows it doesn't have to show everything, and moments that could be gory are avoided. Things like Howard's sons' tragedy aren't shown. Imagination will fill in the blanks.
Part of that is the time period. This feels a lot like a wholesome 90's movie, on the brink of being too saccharine. The downside to that same feel  is the slower pacing. This has a lot of narration that adds little and frequently cut out to provide context. It does a nice job of building to moments even if it does stack everything against Seabiscuit when we already know the horse will triump.
I do wish the horse felt more like a major player. War Horse (read my review) managed to make the horse feel like a main character, but Seabiscuit is just a means to carry the plot.

 It's a tale of broken people and a broken horse that became a rallying point. People wanted to see something good. It provided hope during desperate times. It's crazy to imagine a sporting event so big today that businesses shut down for a race. While it may have been one of the biggest horse races ever, I don't see a horse race doing that again.

DAILY CALL SHEET: JUNE 27, 2018

Slumber Party Massacre II

Slumber Party Massacre II (1987) Girl group gets gored by a ghostly greaser with a drill-tipped guitar and a dislike for the sexually active. It's Freddy plus Jason doing the Stray Cat Strut. TIL: Chastity is not repression; it appreciates and respects God's gift of sex.

Freaks

Your daily dose of culture courtesy of Freaks (1932) - “Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter and those who matter don’t mind.” - Dr. Seuss

Now Showing Marquee 3

And finally, here’s one more Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom review for you, this time from Catholic Skywalker who has a problem with the film’s particular sour brand of moral equivalence.

PODCAST 314: Why Don't You Play in Hell? & Neon Maniacs [Movies That Kill Edition]


This week Forest brings his "Oh the Humanity, oh the Japanity" series to an end with Why Don't You Play in Hell? about a filmmaker who allows a Japanese mob movie to bankroll the filming of their own mob war...king of. Cory follows up his House reviews with another odd duck, Neon Maniacs about genre movies that kill...kind of.
CONTINUE READING

Blockers (2018)

I saw the trailer to Blockers months ago which is the reason why I wasn't anything good from it. Actually, I was expecting it to be pretty damn bad which is why I wasn't planning on watching it. Unfortunately for my brain, I read some positive reviews and I watched it. 

Lisa (Leslie Mann), Hunter (Ike Barinholtz) and Mitchell (John Cena) are connected with each other because their teenage daughters, Julie (Kathryn Newton), Sam (Gideon Aldon) and Kayla (Geraldine Viswanathan), are friends since they were little. While snooping in Julie's room, they stumble upon their daughters' pact to lose their virginity on prom night so they make their mission to stop them from sealing the deal. 

There's all you need to know about the plot as the film barely has a plot. And it's very clichéd too. The weird and great thing about it is that it is not as shallow as one would think after watching the trailer. There's some sort of coming-of-age plot going on with the adult characters as they realise that teens, their daughters included, need to make their own decision when it comes to sex, and it is quite charming. 

The story also emphasizes how our society, people in general but especially parents, views losing virginity in a completely different way when it comes to girls. If a teen guy does it, it is something to be celebrated; if a teen girl does it, it is some horrific thing that destroyed her innocence forever. Unfortunately, this theme isn't as explored as it should have as it is mentioned only by a couple while arguing. 

The characters are one-dimensional stereotypes, especially the adults, and yet they manage to be quite likeable, with the younger characters being the most interesting of the bunch. The performances, on the other hand, are just decent. 

Universal Pictures
While the film is quite sweet and heartwarming, it is a bit disappointing when it comes to comedy. Though it's not as raunchy as I thought it'd be, and some of the jokes are funny, most of them didn't work for me and there wasn't really a laughing out loud moment in the film. 

Tuesday, 26 June 2018

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Movie Review

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018)
Watch the trailer
Written by: Derek Connolly & Colin Trevorrow (written by), Michael Crichton (based on characters created by)
Directed by: JA Bayona
Starring: Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Rafe Spall, Justice Smith, James Cromwell, B. D. Wong, Jeff Goldblum
Rated: PG-13

Plot
When the island's dormant volcano begins roaring to life, Owen and Claire mount a campaign to rescue the remaining dinosaurs from this extinction-level event.

Verdict
This is a lot of dinosaur action and very little cohesive plot. What happens when dinosaurs are brought stateside? A lot of destruction. This attempts plot and character development, but it's always contrived and characters generally make dumb decisions to move the plot forward. Towards the end I was ready to be done. The ending  is annoying, from a reveal that's present just for shock value to the repercussions. While it leaves it open for a sequel, and one is in the works, it's completely unsatisfying. Now I will go watch Jurassic Park (1993).
Skip it.

Review
The original Jurassic Park, based on the Crichton book came out in 1993. Twenty five years later and the movie franchise is still going, sparked by a resurgence when Jurassic World released in 2015 (read my review). Jurassic World was a really big budget B movie, and the sequel is more of the same.

This is much like the first Jurassic World. It throws a lot at you and there is a lot of contrivance. It follows the rule of cool often. We get a big scene or a fun scene, but it's not always logical.
It's not a Jurassic Park/World movie without a roaring T-rex.
There are quite a few throwbacks to the original. It seems to be a mandate that we get a roaring T-rex. The first scene is a group of mercenaries on the Jurassic World site, stealing Indominus Rex DNA from the bottom of the ocean as the park has flooded partially. It's a set the stage scene, much like the 1993 movie's opening. They are attacked of course, but they don't close the gate and let the megladon out, which is dumb. The megladon could have jumped over the wall if it wanted. We see it jumping in these scenes. While it did escape, why didn't it escape sooner?
Bryce Dallas Howard plays Claire.
Bryce Dallas Howard plays Claire, returning from the first Jurassic World and running a non-profit to save the dinosaurs as the island from Jurassic World has a volcano that will kill all dinosaurs. Should genetically altered dinos returned from the grave live or should nature follow it's course? It's an interesting question that the movie doesn't explore.

John Hammond created Jurassic Park. Has his partner Lockwood ever been mentioned? They play up the name as important and I was wondering if I should know the name. He was Hammond's silent and unknown partner. Until now. I had never heard of him. He tasks Claire with saving the dinosaurs on the island. She recruits Chris Pratt's character Owen.

Mills is the main villain, entrusted to manage Lockwood's estate. In his first scene he seems nice and earnest, but in the next scene when he yells at the grand daughter you just know he's going to turn out bad. While Claire was told she's saving and preserving the dinosaurs, Mills wants to retrieve the dinosaurs and auction them off to the highest bidder. His excuse? It will fund future philanthropic ventures of the estate.
The premise of this movie? What if an auction for dinos found a way.
My biggest question from this movie is about the auction. Did Mills really outfit the basement of the mansion just for this auction? There are dino cages on tracks with various holding cells. This is not something you just have on hand. He built the perfect room for an auction, and this is on top of the lab they have to create new dinos like the laser guide Endo-raptor.
What could possibly go wrong with bringing dinosaurs stateside, putting them in cages and auctioning them off in the basement of your mansion? This is the premise of Fallen Kingdom. Why is it subtitled Fallen Kingdom? From watching the movie I determined the reason is only because it sounds cool.

Jeff Goldblum makes a cameo for no real reason other than fan service. I was surprised he didn't have any cliche lines like, "Life finds a way." There is a lot this movie could cut that wouldn't affect anything. We get two new characters, Franklin and Zia, who work with Claire. Franklin is comic relief, a catch all computer engineer that's afraid of everything. Zia is an outspoken and tough dino vet. You could cut them completely and not lose anything. There's a slightly unhinged mercenary, Wheatley, leading the dino extraction. He double crosses Owen early on. Why would you leave a guy to die instead of finishing the job? The main reason is that if  Wheatley was competent the movie would end before it begins.
Lockwood's grand daughter is part of a big reveal towards the end that goes absolutely nowhere. It's got big implications, but apparently that doesn't matter.
Chris Pratt plays Owen.
This got to a point where I was just waiting for the movie to get to the point, any point. Characters make such dumb decisions just for the sake of the plot. The ending to this is eye roll inducing. From character motivations, to how it unfolds, to the repercussions. It's just dumb. It's the kind of ending that makes the rest of the movie worse, and this already wasn't hitting on much.

Franchise movies have subscribed to the idea of throwing as much on the screen as possible in the hope that something will connect to viewers. These types of movies don't have a point, they are mindless action with huge set pieces, lots of CGI, and the occasional attempt at some kind of plot. The Fast and the Furious franchise, as well as Terminator and even the Marvel movies play to this. I couldn't figure out how Jurassic World did so well at the box office. This follows the same formula and is even worse. I bet it will be a box office smash.